Author: Uri Blass
Date: 20:19:04 01/16/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 16:52:44, Joshua Lee wrote: >The ivanov game always impressed me, white didn't do anything special to win yet >it is way beyond the speed of current computers. >Perfect example why Commercial Programs may not play better than Deep Thought, >atleast not yet. You cannot decide by one game that programs of today are not better than Deep thought. Deep thought did a lot of tactical and positional mistakes in other games that the commercial of today have no problem to avoid. If you look at the games of Deep thought-kasparov you will have no problem to see that programs of today are better. If you look at comp-comp games of Deep thought you are going to find also mistakes of Deep thought that programs of today have no problem to avoid(even in part of the games that deep thought won but got inferior position). You can use one of the top programs(not tiger) to analyze comp-comp games of Deep thought and also to analyze ssdf games of tiger14 against programs that are at least 200 elo weaker (Deep thought played against programs that were supposed to be at least 200 elo weaker in comp-comp games). The target should be to find tactical blunders. I expect people to find that Deep thought did more tactical blunders. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.