Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 01:32:19 01/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 16, 2002 at 20:44:35, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On January 16, 2002 at 19:34:08, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >>No problem. But being asked to do an exam in public based on a false accusation >>is still scandalous. > >He doesn't have to answer. Isn't answering questions based on >false accusations the way a lawsuit works? In a laswuit, yes. What is your point? >Sure, Vincent's not the judge, but it's hardly 'scandalous' either. Well you may think this is a normal procedure. I think JK sending the source (case closed at first glance at it) would have been nicer. Without being asked in public about his qsearch by VD's paladines... Best regards, Bas. >BTW. The same thing happened at the end of CCT3. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.