Author: Brian Katz
Date: 03:30:03 01/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2002 at 05:34:51, Brian Katz wrote: >Posted by Brian Katz (Profile) on January 16, 2002 at 18:13:51: > >In Reply to: Fritz 7 posted by Michael R on January 16, 2002 at 11:02:54: > > >On January 16, 2002 at 11:02:54, Michael R wrote: > >>I recently purchased Fritz 7 and immediately I started a Tourny Between Fritz 7 >>and all the Top Engines. To my surprise Fritz 7 is in last place. It seems to be >>getting creamed and I mean _CREAMED_ by all the other engines. Perhaps I am not >>using the optimal amount of Hash for the time control, Timer is (20/0) And the >>hash had been set to 64. I've also noticed more engine perameters than the >>previous version, Would someone shed a little insight on what to do to perhaps >>"Tweak" it for eng. vs eng. Matches. Any help is much appreciated. Thankyou in >>advance. >>Mike. > >I was having similar problems with Fritz 7, in that it was losing many >tournaments to Fritz 6 or Deep Fritz when I ran engine tournaments. >First off I am running a Hewlett Packard Pavilion 8370 350 MHz Pentium II >processor with the once 64 sdram upgraded to 384 sdram. > >1.) I have been told that if you have the English version of Fritz 7 then your >engine is the 7,0,0,2 upgrade. The on line upgrade makes changes to the >interface only. If anyone knows otherwise, please mention it. >I upgraded on line, and saw no change in the engine file size or version number, >like the Fritz 6 service packs would do for Fritz 6. > >2.) It was suggested to me that I should up the Hash Tables if I have enough >ram. I always set the Hash Tables at perhaps 16-32 MB, sometimes higher. I found >that Deep Fritz ran very well with 32 MB Hash Tables. > In the most recent 5 minute Blitz tournament that I ran before trying to set >the Hash Tables higher for Fritz 7, Fritz 7 lost badly to Fritz 7 and Deep >Fritz. > This time I ran a 5 minute tournament with Fritz 7 set at 128 MB Hash Tables vs >Fritz 6 with 16 MB Hash and Deep Fritz with 32 MB Hash. >To my suprise the outcome was very different. >You'd think that 128 MB Hash would be much too high for a 5 minute (no >increments) speed game. >The tournament with Permanent Brain Turned Off. Book Learning turned on, was 20 >game each Round Robin. >Here are the results: > > 1 2 3 TOTALS > >Fritz 7a ******** 14.0-6.0 13.5-6.5 27.5/40 >Deep Fritz 6.0-14.0 ******** 13.5-6.5 19.5/40 >Fritz 6 6.5-13.5 6.5-13.5 ******** 13.0/40 > >Maybe this is a fluke with such highly set Hash Tables for Fritz 7. >Perhaps someone out there has had a similar result, or will after trying with >Fritz 7a set with High Hash Tables. >You must have lots of RAM for such a high Hash setting. >When I only had the original 64 SDRAM on my computer, Fritz 6 would SWAP like >crazy with only a 32 MB Hash SETTING. So any out there should have HIGHER RAM >before such a HIGH SETTING. (For any out there that were not aware of >this.)Forgive me for mentioning this. It seems that most of the contributors on >this site are Computer Experts, but some only have limited knowledge. > >I would love to hear any feedback on Fritz 7 engine tournaments. >Brian Just to clear up the above statement: Most on this site seem to be Computer Experts!! (THE ABOVE STATEMENT SOUNDS LIKE IT SAYS THAT SOME OF THE COMPUTER EXPERTS HAVE ONLY LIMITED KNOWLEDGE)"BUT SOME ONLY HAVE LIMITED KNOWLEDGE" THIS WAS MEANT TO MEAN THAT: SOME OF US OUT THERE ARE NOT COMPUTER EXPERTS"..AND WELCOME THE INSIGHTS THAT MOST OF YOU HAVE!!! I SINCERELY HOPE THAT NO ONE TOOK THAT STATEMENT THE WRONG WAY AND NO ONE WAS OFFENDED.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.