Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:14:08 01/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2002 at 08:03:24, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On January 17, 2002 at 07:09:13, Bas Hamstra wrote: > >[snip] > >>That would kill the tournament entirely. Most of the tablebase supporting >>programs copy the entire source of the TB module and are by that definition >>clones. > >I guess most would agree that the TB-case is a special case. :) I see the >tablebases more as an independent library. > >If Nalimov would have written a chess engine, where TB was just one part and >would have made it public like Bob does with Crafty, then copying just this part >of his engine would be a (partial) clone for me. Nalimov didn't do it that way >though and it is my understanding that if you ask him nicely, he will give you >permission to use his code in your engine and he would not see this as a clone. > >On a related note: It wouldn't hurt, if someone would really not depend on >Nalimov's TBs but code their own. Who know - maybe they contain some nasty bugs >or something, no-one found out so far because everyone uses them. ;) Not everyone uses them and there is a known problem with them because they are not chess tablebases but tablebases of another game when there is no 50 move rule. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.