Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 05:51:51 01/17/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 17, 2002 at 07:30:23, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On January 17, 2002 at 06:54:57, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On January 17, 2002 at 04:19:32, Bas Hamstra wrote: >> >>>So apparently you were wrong in your prejudice back then. VD puts someone in a >>>bad light, but then it eventually appears things are a tad different. It >doesn't seem you learned your lesson though. >> >>They were 'guilty' as hell for what they were accused of. (Crafty cloning) >>What was missing were all the details surrounding the case, >>and their side of the story. > >They were declared guilty even though (well, minor detail) their side of the >story was missing? > >>It is also an excellent example of why these things should be >>discussed in public, and not with the TD. (who, Hans claims, >>was well-aware of them being a Crafty clone) > >A public forum is the worst possible place for a trial and error. Yes and no. It's how the system works, as soon as you are a somebody be prepared to receive praise, criticism and attacks. It is not much different as in real life with papers and gossip magazines as soon you are a celebrity. In some way everybody has to deal with attacks because the system is not planning to change. Hint, put your side of the story on a web-page. Everytime you are not in agreement point to the page. It's called damage control. Ed >Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.