Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Evaluation Should Be Winning Probability - Not Pawns

Author: J. Wesley Cleveland

Date: 21:02:48 01/17/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 17, 2002 at 07:30:18, Severi Salminen wrote:

>>another advantage of using winning percentage and drawing percentage ia that you
>>could use these to determine how deeply to search branches, e.g. if it is 99%
>>draw, you would not need to search deeper, but if it is 30% win and 40% draw,
>>you would want to search much deeper. Note that both of these would have about 0
>>pawn value.
>
>I think you are now forgetting something: how on earth can we know these
>percentages for sure???

You can't. The question does not even make sense. You can have more confidence
in your estimations is some positions.

>That would mean solving chess, which is still quite far
>away. And now, with pawn values, we are allready doing the same thing: if we
>reach 3-fold rep, or 50-move rep position, we can return (well, my engine
>doesn't, but most do ;). And if a position is 99% draw, I'd like to search
>deeper, that's for sure...

Would you rather spend your time searching this line or another line which is
entirely unclear ?

>Again, pawn values are doing just fine!

Pawn values don't say anything about how good your estimate is.

?Converting
>those to another scale doesn't change a thing, in engine's point of view.
>
>Severi



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.