Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: How Rebel plays at SSDF the bare facts, just statistics and thoughts

Author: Enrique Irazoqui

Date: 04:00:17 06/18/98

Go up one level in this thread


On June 18, 1998 at 03:58:08, Ernst Walet wrote:

>All in all it is quite clear to me why Chessbase took so long to produce their
>auto232 player, they had to figure out how to kick Rebel's butt!

This is false. Frizt 5 does not beat Rebel 9 in a different way than it beats
any other program.

When I said that Rebel 9 did not learn in its SSDF match against Fritz 5, I got
mixed up with the Rebel 8 - Fritz 5 match. Rebel 8 played 13 losing doubles.
Rebel 9 played no doubles at all, as anyone can check. So all this discussion
about brain surgery, Rebel 9's learner being upset in that match, etc., makes no
sense at all because it's all based on this mistake made by yours truly. So much
for relying on memory when talking about facts :((((((((((

My apologies, Enrique



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.