Author: Albert Silver
Date: 04:45:29 01/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2002 at 06:42:09, CLiebert wrote:
>Nearly all of the most interessting profi-engines are only running under fritz
>and not under other GUIs. And I do want a rating list without them, this would
>be like a bundesliga-tableau without bayern, leverkusen and dortmund, but with
>Bochum, Mainz and Fürth.
>
>Hiarcs732, latest Nimzo8, Fritz5/6/7, Junior 4.6/5/6/7, Shredder6. Tiger doesn´t
>support WB or UCI but runs under fritz too. Goliath XP and Light doesn´t support
>Tablesbases under WB but running under fritz well, too. SOS will, Yace too. Also
>Gromit. So there are very good reasons to opt for fritz, because the stronger
>engines are more important than the weaker ones behind crafty!
I'm not sure I understand. Is your rating list about engines/programs in general
or about the engines of a specific GUI? If it's the first then you must test
engines that don't run under the Fritz GUI, and if it's the latter, you should
just say it: rating list of engines in Fritz GUI. Otherwise, you aren't being
forthcoming and this will lead to misunderstandings.
Albert
>
>Christian
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.