Author: Martin Schubert
Date: 05:04:48 01/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2002 at 07:04:01, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On January 20, 2002 at 06:42:09, CLiebert wrote: > >>Nearly all of the most interessting profi-engines are only running under fritz >>and not under other GUIs. And I do want a rating list without them, this would >>be like a bundesliga-tableau without bayern, leverkusen and dortmund, but with >>Bochum, Mainz and Fürth. > >Nonsens ! > >We have: >Tiger, Chess Partner, Chess Assistant, CBase >Rebel, DOS in the future WB an within all other commercial GUIs >Gandalf, Chess Partner, WB and within all other commercial GUIs >Nimzo, CBase, WB and within all other commercial GUIs >TheKing, CBase, WB and within all other commercial GUIs >Fritz, CBase, UCI and within CA, Shredder others in the future >Junior, CBase Baby >Hiarcs, CBase Baby >Shredder, CBase, UCI and within CA, Shredder others in the future > >And with WinBoard is CBase on the last place from all commercial GUIs. > >Why the programs Junior, Hiarcs are running only under Fritz? >An own concept ! > >>Hiarcs732, latest Nimzo8, Fritz5/6/7, Junior 4.6/5/6/7, Shredder6. Tiger doesn´t >>support WB or UCI but runs under fritz too. Goliath XP and Light doesn´t support >>Tablesbases under WB but running under fritz well, too. SOS will, Yace too. Also >>Gromit. So there are very good reasons to opt for fritz, because the stronger >>engines are more important than the weaker ones behind crafty! > >You speak from 2-3 engines. >We have 140 other engines !!! > >Your opinion is maybe the reason for Chess-Base pro reviews in the past? > >Hey Christian, you are redakteur from a computer chess magazine, please open >your eyes ! > >The GUI with the most engine support is Chess-Assistant !! >Full WB, UCI, MCS, own concept (+ Dragon). > >Compare CB: >Bad WB, UCI now 2-3 days, CB and not more ! >This is bad, OK a little bit better with UCI now. > >Best >Frank Hi, Frank! Even if I prefer CA to ChessBase, I think a BFF rating list is more interesting then a "best for ca"-rating list. Because all top programs run under ChessBase-GUI. Here I do agree with Christian. But I think it's quite interesting that you here now the word UCI from Christian for the first time now that Fritz is going to support UCI. I never read anything about CA in CSS except the review (anything about CA in the Tips&Tricks?), so information about CA is poor IMO in CSS. But I don't think the BFF is a good example for this. Best, Martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.