Author: Ulrich Tuerke
Date: 06:20:01 01/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2002 at 09:01:50, David Rasmussen wrote: >There must be a value system of material that takes care of all special cases. > >1,3,3,5,9: > >Has the following problems: >3 pawns for bishop or knight is almost always a bad idea. I have bishop and knight slighly higher than 3, where bishop is again a bit more than knight value. Uli >2 knights/bishops for rook and pawn is almost always a bad idea. >2 rooks for queen is often not a good idea. >3 knights/bishops for a queens is often not a good idea. Then again, often it is >:) > >What is your best bet? > >/David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.