Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 07:29:10 06/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 17, 1998 at 15:58:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >On June 17, 1998 at 03:17:22, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >> >>If Auto-232 matches are supposed to be conducted without alternating colours >>between each game, it's the fault of the Chessbase autoplayer. Otherwise, it >>isn't. The human procedure is irrelevant here, except for the question "why the >>heck isn't Auto-232 defined so that colours are alternated between games?" >> >>I have never used Auto-232, so I don't know what any related standard specifies. >> >>Dave Gomboc > >Standard specifies for example that after a game you get the 'save previous >game' command, which fritz5 autoplayer doesn't give if i read stuff right >at CCC, which is clearly showing that they knew this in advance. > >If you don't store the games, but only f5 saves them, >what does that mean then? > >Vincent Well, to me, it means that the Fritz 5 autoplayer is broken, and should be fixed. It also means that results against software that is affected because of the deviation from the Auto-232 specifications is invalidated. Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.