Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:13:35 01/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 20, 2002 at 15:01:45, Miguel A. Ballicora wrote: >On January 20, 2002 at 14:31:54, Roy Eassa wrote: > >>If one owns Chess Assistant 6.1, would there any reason to also own Bookup? > >Bookup is the only piece of commercial chess software I own, I have version 1.01 >for Windows. I cannot imagine that Chess Assistant could do anything like bookup >does. The tree function I see from its demo is cool but it is not the same. They >complement each other and both can communicate with epd and pgn. In a way, >Bookup is unique. IMHO, it is a bit expensive but if you really are into either > >1) Serious study of openings >2) Correspondence chess > >You will **LOVE** it. I think that is a wonderful complement for any Chess >database. IMHO, if you are a pro-player or a opening theoretician you will be a >fool if you do not have it (along with a strong engine and chess database, of >course). It is the _best_ way to store you own analysis and conclusions. >Now, it is useful for a lesser player? I do not know. I guess it is for its >training mode. > Miguel, What _specifically_ can you do with Bookup that one could not do (or not easily do) with CA 6.1?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.