Author: Bruce Moreland
Date: 10:35:47 06/18/98
Go up one level in this thread
On June 18, 1998 at 06:28:48, Ernst A. Heinz wrote: >On June 18, 1998 at 04:16:15, blass uri wrote: >>On June 17, 1998 at 14:49:15, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>black to move >>> >>>position white Kh3,Ra4,a2,f4,g3,h4 >>> black Kc4,Rc3,b4,e6,f5,g6 >>> black to move wins easily >>> >>>Believe it or not, diep managed to lost this as it didn't play Ra3, >>>it played Re3. >>>This is so simple, but i haven't worked at endgame yet. >> >>Fritz5 is not better in this position it needed more than 80 seconds >>to find Ra3 is winning >>before that(after 1 minute on my pentium 200MMX) it prefered Re3 >>It intended to play Ra3 without seeing it is winning after some >>seconds but change its mind > >That's really surprising because it actually is so simple. > >"DarkThought" fails high on 1. Ra3! in iteration #9 after less >than 1 sec. I don't know what is going on here either. Mine gets Ra3 in < 1 second on a P6/200, with a score of +2, has +4 in 6 seconds, and has +7 in 38 seconds. Is this because Fritz is doing null move in K+P endings or something? bruce
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.