Author: Georg v. Zimmermann
Date: 06:35:25 01/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
You are quite right to be picky. Annotations dont make sense when they are wrong. For the first mistake I have an excuse: I just rewrote it, firstSquare used to be part of the struct bitboard and therefore really didnt need input :) Georg On January 21, 2002 at 09:07:41, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On January 21, 2002 at 08:45:48, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: > >>/* Function: firstSquare >> * Input: None >> * Output: A square >> * Purpose: Used to get the lowest square that is set in a bitboard. >> */ > >>inline int firstSquare (qword a) > >Input none, huh? ;) > > >[snip] > > >>/* >> * Function: removeAttacks >> * Input: A color and a bitboard of squares >> * Output: None. >> * Purpose: Decrements the attacks array on squares that a piece attacks >> * >> */ >> >>void boardStruct::removeAttacks(color c, piece p, square sq) > >Input is a bitboard of squares, huh? :) > > >Sorry to be that picky. :) But I couldn't resist. :)) > >Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.