Author: Steve Maughan
Date: 10:36:36 01/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
Frank, >It is possible to give for Chess-Base GUIs the order: >Stop UCI if the engine see that he is working under Chess-Base GUIs. > >A logical reaction in my opinion. >No WB support, no UCI support ... it's easy ! You could argue that CB doesn't have WB support now - so propper UCI support is better than what we have at the moment! I definitely want UCI support. There has certainly been a buzz about UCI since it was runoured that CB would support UCI. I can see that with the new freeware GUI and CB support UCI will become *extremely* popular. From a programming point I have implemented winboard support in my engine but looking at the UCI protocol it seems much tighter and almost as easy to implement. I'm looking forward to making it UCI compatible. It'll be great when we have a healthy UCI community that can compete on equal terms with Fritz et al. Regards, Steve PS I think CB should also come up with a decent Auto232 alternative that's a bit more stable
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.