Author: Heiner Marxen
Date: 13:50:04 01/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2002 at 15:25:55, Joshua Lee wrote: >New game >[D] 3qk3/8/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Fritz 7: > >1.e4! > +- (28.97) Depth: 8/17 00:00:00 103kN >1.e4 Qd4 2.Qh5+ Kf8 3.Qf5+ Kg7 4.f4 Qa4 5.Qe5+ Kg8 6.Kf2 Qxc2 > +- (29.04) Depth: 8/19 00:00:00 240kN >1.e4! > +- (29.32) Depth: 9/19 00:00:01 390kN >1.d4! > +- (29.35) Depth: 9/21 00:00:05 1320kN >1.d4! > +- (29.63) Depth: 10/21 00:00:07 1760kN >1.d4! > +- (29.91) Depth: 10/23 00:00:10 2790kN >1.e4! > +- (29.94) Depth: 10/24 00:00:14 4134kN >1.e4! > +- (30.10) Depth: 10/24 00:00:14 4278kN >1.e4 Qa5 2.Qg4 Kf8 3.Qf5+ Qxf5 4.exf5 Kg7 5.d4 Kf6 6.g4 > +- (30.19) Depth: 10/25 00:00:18 5539kN >1.e4! > +- (30.47) Depth: 11/25 00:00:21 6351kN >1.e4! > +- (30.75) Depth: 11/25 00:00:23 7063kN >1.e4! > +- (31.04) Depth: 12/27 00:00:29 9091kN >1.e4! > +- (31.32) Depth: 12/27 00:00:36 11623kN >1.e4! > +- (31.88) Depth: 12/27 00:00:40 13218kN >1.e4 Qa5 2.Nc3 Kd8 3.Qg4 Kc7 4.Nd5+ Kb8 5.Qg8+ Kb7 6.Bb5 Qxb5 7.Qf7+ > +- (33.57) Depth: 12/30 00:01:30 30984kN >1.e4! > +- (33.85) Depth: 13/29 00:01:52 38712kN >1.e4! > +- (34.13) Depth: 13/29 00:01:56 40156kN >1.e4! > +- (34.69) Depth: 13/29 00:02:05 43448kN >1.e4 Ke7 2.d4 Qd6 3.Qh5 > +- (37.63) Depth: 13/32 00:04:45 99463kN >1.e4 Ke7 2.d4 Qd6 3.Qh5 > +- (37.72) Depth: 14/33 00:08:17 174386kN >1.e4! > +- (38.00) Depth: 15/35 00:12:36 266115kN >1.e4! > +- (38.29) Depth: 15/37 00:16:40 351064kN >1.e4! > +- (38.85) Depth: 15/37 00:19:56 418816kN >1.e4 Qa5 2.Nc3 > +- (#83) Depth: 15/39 03:52:39 4982616kN >1.e4 Qa5 2.Nc3 > +- (#83) Depth: 15/39 03:59:44 5139568kN > >(Lee, Pensacola,FL 21.01.2002) > >For some strange reason though Fritz 7 stoped listing the time in the engine >window but still lists the time at the bottom of the screen >It's hard to be 100% sure if this is the best line but it is the only mate found >in this position that i have heard of. This is Test#91 from Valentin Albillo: http://www.multimania.com/albillo/ajedre9a.htm It is supected to be a mate in 12. If that is true, it is still out of reach for Chest (extrapolated 1 month on an Athlon 1500+). As far as I know, there is no complete forced mate known, besides the one you show us. But #83? Isn't that a bit deep? That would indeed be very interesting. Can you give us more PV? Cheers, Heiner
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.