Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 02:09:51 01/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2002 at 03:45:55, Uri Blass wrote: >If you ask me I prefer >1,3.4,3.5,5,9.3 but the idea of chess books was not to explain things to >computers and it is more simple to remember 1,3,3,5,9 > >Uri Here is an idea I've been working on: It's faster to get the attack bitboard for knights than for bishops. And I believe humans in general has bigger problems calculating tactics with knights than with bishops, where as the computer doesn't really care. So it would seem it is in the programs interest to _keep_ the knights on the board for both players. This would spell anti-symmetry: Computer: 1,3.5,3.4,5,9.3 Human: 1,3.4,3.5,5,9.3 (if we use Uri's values) Could this work? -S.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.