Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why not a Rebel for those who like a decent OS?

Author: Kim Roper Jensen

Date: 02:55:42 01/22/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 22, 2002 at 02:44:19, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On January 22, 2002 at 02:32:03, David Rasmussen wrote:
>
>>On January 22, 2002 at 00:59:21, James Doby  wrote:
>>
>>>Ok if rebel doesn't Run on Windows XP, is their any disadvantage to installing
>>>windows98 along with windows XP? Is this Possible? I can't see myself giving up
>>>my favorite program just to upgrade to XP
>>
>>?
>
>It will be here before long, I am sure.  I believe that it is one of Ed's top
>priorities.
>
>It won't be at all easy, since Rebel is written largely in assembly language.

I could be wrong but didnt Ed say that he had the engine in C and then compiled
to get the asm file AND then optimized THAT code ????? Then it could be a
question about how much speed hes willing to sacrifice to make it windows
compatible

I think it was in some earlier post, regarding the asm optmization debate

With regards
Kim



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.