Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 03:12:49 01/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 21, 2002 at 21:57:49, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >It is my opinion that Frank interpreted the stuff written >in the CSS channels exactly as how i interpreted it. So do I, but I disagree about the "counterattack" proposed. >Also chessbase considering stopping winboard support, >as they do not earn money with it but lose a lot of >effort and budget of their helpdesk support to it >(all speculation from my side) would fit exactly in this picture. If you've spent a little time at CSS then the MO is rather obvious. Quite a few people - most of the anonymous - try their best to discredit WinBoard as bugridden and obsolete when the opportunity arises. The only argument being the words of SMK. In that sense nothing of the current information is surprising. The propaganda war started a long time ago. Personally I don't care what protocol they choose to support. But the method applied is disgusting IMO. Regards, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.