Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 07:36:57 01/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2002 at 01:33:37, Antonio Dieguez wrote: >On January 21, 2002 at 19:27:29, Antonio Dieguez wrote: > >>On January 20, 2002 at 20:03:45, Bas Hamstra wrote: >> >>>Using PVS, I don't use an aspiration window for quite a while now. As far as I >>>can see it hardly matters. How is your experience? Data? >> >>now i have data. Yes, it hardly matters. It is about equal, I saw just 1% worse >>in average in the positions i tried by some reason. >> >>Thanks for the surprise, my only excuse to not seen it is that i dont use only >>pvs, altough using 10 times larger windows only makes my default alphabeta-pvs >>mix search 4% more nodes in average (not that bad, also a surprise) > >argh what a bad memory I have (no kidding, lately...), I actually had planned >add a 0 at the end of the numbers of the windows, but for some reason what i >finally did was adding a 2 at the beginning, so they got multiplied by a factor >beetween 3 and 7. > I keep trying, but I got the same, pvs with small windows and pvs with big windows are about the same for me, less than 1% difference. And my current search ouperforms them by almost 4%. It would be a mistake from my side to do the same as you just for simplicity. I will keep trying a little bit more... This makes such a small difference anyway... well... best wishes.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.