Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 09:02:41 01/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2002 at 06:12:49, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 21, 2002 at 21:57:49, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>It is my opinion that Frank interpreted the stuff written >>in the CSS channels exactly as how i interpreted it. > >So do I, but I disagree about the "counterattack" proposed. > >>Also chessbase considering stopping winboard support, >>as they do not earn money with it but lose a lot of >>effort and budget of their helpdesk support to it >>(all speculation from my side) would fit exactly in this picture. > >If you've spent a little time at CSS then the MO is rather obvious. Quite a few >people - most of the anonymous - try their best to discredit WinBoard as >bugridden and obsolete when the opportunity arises. The only argument being the >words of SMK. In that sense nothing of the current information is surprising. >The propaganda war started a long time ago. Personally I don't care what >protocol they choose to support. But the method applied is disgusting IMO. > >Regards, >Mogens I support winboard. Period. I have no plans to _ever_ support UCI or any other protocol. I would suggest that everybody follow this and leave ChessBase alone. They will realize that it is an advantage to both support winboard _and_ support it right rather than with the piece of crap design they currently use.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.