Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 12:04:46 01/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2002 at 13:41:32, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On January 22, 2002 at 12:02:41, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>I support winboard. Period. I have no plans to _ever_ support UCI or >>any other protocol. I would suggest that everybody follow this and leave >>ChessBase alone. They will realize that it is an advantage to both support >>winboard _and_ support it right rather than with the piece of crap design >>they currently use. > >That is also the view I support. But it is not difficult to understand an >aspiring chess programmer's ambition to test his progress against the best >commercial engines. Especially without knowing the history. > >BTW, could one imagine that the Chessbase people would create a Crafty UCI >engine from the available source code? Much in the same manner as the current >native version. > >Secondly, I feel obligated :-) to bug you about the lack of an 18.13 executable >at your ftpsite. Or is there a chance of adjustments being made after the CCT4 >tournament is over? He doesn't make them. Bob runs Linux versions. You need to bug Eugene instead. Meanwhile, Thomas Mayer has a binary and I made one too. Eugene's will be better when it does arrive.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.