Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:10:18 01/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 22, 2002 at 19:31:08, Thomas Mayer wrote: >Hi, > >for those who search, a little service of the winboard-newsticker: > >http://www.winboardengines.de/html/uciengines.html > >overview over the available ones... > >Greets, Thomas > >P.S.: NO, UCI will not get an important part of my ticker - but there seems to >be some need for this information, so... Thanks for this information It seems that there are only 10 UCI engines in the world when there are more than an hundred of winboard engines based on what I remember from the past. In this case I really do not understand a possible decision to support only UCI and not winboard engines. If chessbase want more programmers to buy their programs then common sense say that supporting winboard engines is more productive then supporting UCI engines. more programmers are going to be able to test their programs against Fritz,Junior,Shredder,Tiger... if chessbase interface can support winboard engines. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.