Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 13:45:58 01/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2002 at 16:31:08, John Merlino wrote: >On January 23, 2002 at 16:10:53, William Penn wrote: > >>On January 23, 2002 at 12:11:15, John Merlino wrote: >> >>>On January 23, 2002 at 05:50:54, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >>> >>>>Now that CB has integrated UCI with their latest patch, will The King in the >>>>future support UCI, say from version 9000? >>>> >>>>Regards >>>>Jonas >>> >>>There are currently no plans to support UCI with the next version of >>>Chessmsater. >>> >>>jm >> >>Good for you. Keep it as simple as possible! The more unnecessary code/features >>you can cut out (or prevent) the better... >>WP > >Your opinion is generally in the minority, but we agree with you on this one. > Keeping out unnecessary GUI features is one thing. Leaving out support for THE best/newest standard for chess engines is another. UCI is gaining tremendous momentum -- even Chessbase has signed on. Why be behind your competitors with a feature that will you will ultimately implement anyway?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.