Author: walter irvin
Date: 16:05:33 01/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 23, 2002 at 14:13:26, Roy Eassa wrote: >On January 23, 2002 at 13:51:33, Ian Aston wrote: > >>On January 23, 2002 at 13:45:54, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>How would you rank these four programs: >>> >>>Hiarcs 7.32 >>> >>>Nimzo 8 >>> >>>Shredder 6 >>> >>>Gandalf 5 >>> >>>...in order from strongest to weakest? >> >> >>1) Shredder 6 >> >>2) Hiarcs 7.32 >> >>3) Gandalf 5 >> >>4) Nimzo 8 >> >>Since Hiarcs is my favourite program I may be a little biased, but not much. >> >>IA > > >I don't own any of them, so I can only go on the hundreds of results I've seen >posted here. It seems to me that Shredder 6, Hiarcs 7.32, and Gandalf 5 are >very, very close in strength. Nimzo 8 does appear to be somewhat weaker. (Of >course, Chess Tiger 14 [& GT2] and Fritz 7 are clearly stronger, according to >most results, and Junior 7 seems to be weaker than F7 but stronger than the >programs mentioned in the subject.) > >Next question: is any of the four programs in the subject stronger than Fritz 6? > Than Junior 6? i have seen lots of games between all of those programs on my computer . to me chess tiger ,deep fritz ,gamit tiger , hiarcs really impress me .junior just doesn't seem to dominate .shredder 6 to me was a little dissapointing , its very strong but i thought it would dominate the others , but it dont .chess tiger was the big surprise to me . now it dominates .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.