Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: UCI-Engines

Author: walter irvin

Date: 17:14:24 01/23/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 23, 2002 at 10:12:58, Thomas Mayer wrote:

>Hi Uri,
>
>> It seems that there are only 10 UCI engines in the world when there are more
>> than an hundred of winboard engines based on what I remember from the past.
>
>and to add is here maybe that 8 of those 10 are also WinBoard engines, there are
>only 2 pure UCI - engines, Shredder & SOS... At the moment, we have, I think
>over 120 free available winboard engines and I believe with all the private
>engines (like yours... when is release date, Uri... :))) we are for sure over
>200 engines in the winboard sector...
>To be honest, the publication of this short UCI-list is also my way to try to
>get some ChessBase users on my site and to show them that there is a big
>computer chess world outside of ChessBase natives and UCI... If only one of them
>will try a winboard engine and winboard it was worth the effort... :)
>
>>In this case I really do not understand a possible decision to support only
>>UCI and not winboard engines.
>
>I think WinBoard support will stay in ChessBase products... As long they don't
>have a better adapter they only do not offer it for download at their
>hompepage... And despite of the the WinBoard-Adapter-Problem, I believe that the
>UCI implementation is a good idea... some first reports there seem to be still
>some minor problems and incompatibilitys... But it's a new feature... (Anyway,
>sometimes still I wonder who are their Beta-Testers... :)
>
>> more programmers are going to be able to test their programs against
>> Fritz,Junior,Shredder,Tiger... if chessbase interface can support winboard
>> engines.
>
>well, thats a task for the customers to explain ChessBase that their is some
>need for a good adapter... At the moment I think ChessBase does not care much,
>they do not see for what they should create a better Adapter, they don't think
>that they will sell more with a good adapter... As long this is the case they
>will not change anything. From programmers view I can still test against the
>ChessBase family... the old way, auto232 and two PCs... :)
>
>Greets, Thomas

can i get an old winboard adaptor at your site ???? i like the old way but i
have been away from computer chess for a year .i lost all my old winboard file
most notibly winboard adaptor .let me know where your site is .



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.