Author: walter irvin
Date: 14:11:49 01/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 24, 2002 at 16:24:06, Roy Eassa wrote: >On January 24, 2002 at 15:10:32, walter irvin wrote: > >>On January 24, 2002 at 14:30:00, Roy Eassa wrote: >> >>>On January 23, 2002 at 20:19:23, walter irvin wrote: >>> >>>>i dont know why but my deep fritz chews up my fritz 7 ,spanks it real good .the >>>>only program i got that can hang with deep fritz is tiger 14 + gamit .my fritz >>>>7 is not to me anything special , even shredder 6 is not like tiger and deep >>>>fritz . >>>> >>>>just a thought >>> >>> >>>Do you have tournament or match results showing that Deep Fritz 6, running on a >>>single CPU, outperforms Fritz 7? >>> >>>Many people have posted results showing that Fritz 7 (after the upgrade) is >>>stronger than Deep Fritz 6 running on 1 CPU. However, nearly all results DO >>>agree with you that Chess Tiger 14 (and Gambit Tiger 2.0) belong at or near the >>>very top of the rankings. >> >>on my cel 700 mhz 256 meg single cpu after 2600 + tourn games mostly 5 min blitz >>it was tiger 14 then deep fritz then gamit tiger then shredder 6 so fritz 7 >>was after them .hiarcs did well , junior 7 and junior 6 did not do well at all >>, i think crafty might have done better .it seems junior does better at slower >>time controls . > > >Did you make sure to use only versions of Fritz 7 equal to or greater than >7.0.0.2 (because the original, 7.0.0.1, was considerably weaker)? i dont considder fritz 7 score to be that bad based on who it was playing ,i was just surprised that deep fritz did better .the funny thing is that just plain fritz 6 did not do as well as fritz 7 .when i play fritz 6 vs deep fritz , deep fritz wins .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.