Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:57:18 01/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2002 at 12:26:12, Vincent Lejeune wrote: >On January 25, 2002 at 11:52:03, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>00:00:00.8 -1,77 1 79 b5 bxc5 bxa4 >>00:00:00.9 0,58 1 97 d5 >>00:00:00.0 0,62 1 137 Rf5 >>00:00:00.1 0,53 2 202 Rf5 f4 >>00:00:00.3 0,71 2 441 d5 cxd5 Rxd5 >>00:00:00.3 0,71 2 700 Re5 >>00:00:00.5 1,50 2 733 Re5 Kd3 Rxe4 Kxe4 >>00:00:00.1 1,50 3 1434 Re5 Kd3 Rxe4 Kxe4 >>00:00:00.1 1,52 4 7184 Re5 Rxe5 dxe5 Kd3 Kg7 Ke4 Kf6 >>00:00:00.1 1,50 5 24102 Re5 Rxe5 dxe5 Kd3 Ke8 Ke4 f6 f3 >>00:00:00.3 1,50 6 31180 Re5 Rxe5 dxe5 Kd3 Ke8 Ke4 f6 f3 >>00:00:00.6 1,53 7 93348 Re5 Rxe5 dxe5 Kd3 Ke8 Ke4 f6 a5 >>00:00:00.1 1,53 8 161786 Re5 Rxe5 dxe5 Kd3 Ke8 Ke4 f6 a5 > >It seems that WIndows-Rebel have the same bug in timing as chesstiger have too > >the tenth of second are not counted logically :o) > >how do you "round" the value ?? How many games did Rebel lose on time because of that bug? If it cannot lose games on time because of that bug then it seems that the bug is in printing and not in counting. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.