Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 14:31:56 01/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 25, 2002 at 17:25:56, Albert Silver wrote: [snip] >I don't think that's necessary, unless by playing nearly perfectly you just mean >avoiding losing moves. The way you put it, it sounds as if there are very few >non-losing moves (i.e. a narrow road to avoid losing against perfect play) >whereas I believe there are many many roads to a draw that even perfect play >from the other side would not easily avoid. Perhaps. Imagine this: How many times will a 5 year old, who correctly knows the rules of chess but never sees beyond 2 plies do against Kasparov? I submit that they will never win or draw, for all practical purposes. A perfect player verses Kasparov should be far more dominating than that.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.