Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard?

Author: Mike Hood

Date: 14:37:15 01/25/02

From all that I've read about UCI, it seems to have several technical advantages
over Winboard. But, as we all know, the best product doesn't always succeed.

There will only be large support among chess engine programmers if there is a
high quality free GUI available. (If UCI interpreatation remains proprietary to
Chessbase it will kill the protocol before it even takes off). Is there a
comparable freeware equivalent of the Winboard program (WinUCI)? If not, are
there any plans to create one?

• Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Yes Arena Aaron Tay 08:23:03 01/26/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Yes Arena Andrew Williams 11:19:51 01/26/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Yes Arena Aaron Tay 23:31:50 01/26/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Yes Arena Miguel A. Ballicora 00:11:03 01/27/02
• Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Richard Heldmann 06:24:12 01/26/02
• x/winboard is just fine most of the time (nt) Georg v. Zimmermann 05:48:49 01/26/02
• UCI has several disadvantages Peter McKenzie 16:44:15 01/25/02
  • Re: UCI has several disadvantages Frank Phillips 01:25:45 01/26/02
• Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Odd Gunnar Malin 15:50:05 01/25/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Severi Salminen 01:06:47 01/26/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Volker Pittlik 02:17:57 01/26/02
• Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Dann Corbit 14:49:11 01/25/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative? NO, and here's why. Roy Eassa 12:29:24 01/26/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative? NO, and here's why. Mogens Larsen 12:49:44 01/26/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Vincent Diepeveen 17:04:43 01/25/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Tim Mann 16:03:51 01/30/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Mike Hood 15:52:57 01/25/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Dann Corbit 16:08:55 01/25/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Robin Smith 23:46:32 01/25/02
        • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Dann Corbit 11:22:54 01/26/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Miguel A. Ballicora 15:21:35 01/25/02
  • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Walter Eigenmann 15:17:40 01/25/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Thomas Mayer 22:27:58 01/25/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Torstein Hall 17:58:59 01/26/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Roy Eassa 12:36:22 01/26/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Mogens Larsen 06:35:54 01/26/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Peter Berger 15:39:02 01/25/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Aaron Tay 08:28:17 01/26/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Miguel A. Ballicora 15:28:03 01/25/02
    • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Dann Corbit 15:25:10 01/25/02
      • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Ingo Bauer 20:43:26 01/25/02
        • Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Martin Schubert 02:05:06 01/26/02
• Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Ian Aston 14:41:57 01/25/02

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.