Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: CCT4; clarification of rules?

Author: enrico carrisco

Date: 20:20:34 01/25/02

Go up one level in this thread


The problem with the HIARCS - Isichess match was not related to manual
operation.  A problem with the adapter that allows HIARCS to play through
winboard via the auto232 protocol failed.  It is still unknown if the problem
was a result of the autoplayer itself or WinBoard (we could not recreate the
problem, nor has the problem ever happened before out of over 40,000 online
games with the same sort of setup...)

-elc.

On January 25, 2002 at 11:23:03, Will Singleton wrote:

>Because the tournament rules allow manual operation, it's likely that operator
>errors will occur (as they did last weekend).  Since the decision was made to go
>manual, and since people make mistakes, it seems logical to allow for
>corrections.
>
>In the case of the Hiarcs-Isichess game, there was significant sentiment,
>perhaps a majority, of participants who wanted the mistake corrected.  I'm not
>arguing with that decision; it was made by the TD and that's it.  And, there
>were other similar problems (Lordx, for example), and there will be more this
>weekend.
>
>When we are running fully automatic next time, this won't be an issue.  But for
>now, it might be a good idea to clarify the rules on the issue of operator
>mistakes.  Something like: In the case of a *clear* operator error, the game may
>be restarted or replayed from the point of error, at the discretion of the TD.
>
>Will



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.