Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Some Philosophical questions on the limits of Computer chess

Author: Janosch Zwerensky

Date: 09:23:00 01/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


> The key
>word there is fatal.

The whole point of the concept of a "perfect player" is that against such an
entity *every* mistake is fatal.

> You are presuming that not only will the perfect player
>will have forced winning sequences at hand at every move, but also that Kasparov
>will forcibly make a fatal mistake.

If the perfect player is playing aggressive enough, chances are that Kasparov
won't be able to give perfect responses *every* time over a game of 70 moves or
so.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.