Author: Albert Silver
Date: 09:52:34 01/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2002 at 12:29:50, Janosch Zwerensky wrote:
>
>>And finally you have a miserable 3 moves that don't lose forcibly.
>
>The problem is that often two of these three will give the opponent the
>opportunity to create lots of pressure in the long run. "Creating lots of
>pressure" here means that the opponent can steer the game into a direction where
>less than three correct moves are available per ply for the human.
If it gets reduced to only 2 or 3 then possibly, but that still doesn't change
the probability. Also, it most likely will be much more than 3 moves in most
positions. In an equal position I'd be very surprised if there were only 3
non-losing moves. That would be insane and extremely unlikely. That would mean
that only 3 plans or move-orders are possible and that don't lose. Sounds like a
very different game than the one I know. I don't see how or why the balance of
the position could be so delicate or compromised.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.