Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 10:59:51 01/26/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 26, 2002 at 13:35:14, karen Dall Lynn wrote: >Yes, we have something here. > >I am starting to work with the hypothesis that Fritz 7 evaluates its own book >moves in a much more strict manner than Fritz 6 - which quicly changes the >weights. When I made the tests I played fast bullet against Fritz with random >moves. And resigned. It is not impossible that the whole string of moves may >have looked to Fritz as rubbish and rubbish it surely was. :-)) I don't think Fritz have sufficient AI to make a distinction between winning against someone playing rubbish moves and someone losing the old fashioned way :-). >However it is still obscure for me why Fritz does not change the evaluation of >the white moves when I play black against it and lose, with ordinary average >player's black moves in a non-rated game. In this case there is no rubbish yet >the weights remain unrevised. It is possible that learning is restricted to rated games when it comes to Fritz 7. With Nimzo 8 learning seem to be working without insisting on a rated game, eg. a normal blitz game. The only other thing I can think of would be the book options, where the learning strength might be set too low. I'm certain that you've checked that already. >Thank you for your reply. No problem. I'm sorry that I can't be of more help. But I don't own Fritz 7. Good luck, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.