Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative to Winboard? Yes Arena

Author: Andrew Williams

Date: 11:19:51 01/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 26, 2002 at 11:23:03, Aaron Tay wrote:

>On January 25, 2002 at 17:37:15, Mike Hood wrote:
>
>>From all that I've read about UCI, it seems to have several technical advantages
>>over Winboard. But, as we all know, the best product doesn't always succeed.
>>
>>There will only be large support among chess engine programmers if there is a
>>high quality free GUI available. (If UCI interpreatation remains proprietary to
>>Chessbase it will kill the protocol before it even takes off). Is there a
>>comparable freeware equivalent of the Winboard program (WinUCI)? If not, are
>>there any plans to create one?
>
>Look for Arena now in beta-testing.
>
>Aaron

Is there a linux version of Arena?

Andrew



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.