Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is UCI a politically viable alternative? NO, and here's why.

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 12:49:44 01/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 26, 2002 at 15:29:24, Roy Eassa wrote:

>UCI is politically dead, and the reason is simple:
>
>Such politically powerful people as John Merlino, Robert Hyatt, and Dann Corbit
>have spoken up publicly against it.

I have a feeling you overestimate the importance of some people here. Especially
among the general masses. The UCI protocol will survive as long as an important
software company as Chessbase supports it. It may not be the dominant protocol,
but I doubt it'll end its days in obscurity anytime soon.

Regards,
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.