Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 05:39:17 01/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2002 at 08:33:07, Frank Phillips wrote: >However imperfect, we are probably better basing our conclusions on the >information we have, rather that we do not yet posses. > What does that mean? That whenever someone posts a 10 game match between Fritz and Tiger that have Fritz as the winner with 7-3, then it safer to conclude that Fritz is better than to conclude nothing, because we don't have enough statistical material? Statisticians will disagree with you. This is the essence of statistical significance. >Well done Quark - seems like a fine program. > A very fine one indeed. /David
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.