Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 09:38:34 01/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 27, 2002 at 12:18:20, Lyn Harper wrote: > Guys, if we are going to talk about 'statistical significance', then > the tourney itself is a waste of time. > Sure, these results do not set Quark up on a pedestal as the greatest > program around. Quark is capable of competing well with the best of > them, and congratulations to the programmer! Nobody is saying otherwise. I am very well aware that this tourney is not statistically significant. That is my point, in fact. /David
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.