Author: Jonas Cohonas
Date: 02:44:38 01/28/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 28, 2002 at 05:27:46, pavel wrote: > >> >>AMD T-Bird 1.3 Ghz 1.5 Gb ram >>2+ 2 >>Ponder=on >>Booklearn=on >>3+4+5 men tb's >> >> Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws >> >>1 Fritz 7 : 2677 27 27 446 62.0 % 2592 35.2 % >>2 Chess Tiger 14.0 : 2658 28 24 447 58.8 % 2595 39.8 % >>3 Deep Fritz : 2626 30 25 457 53.9 % 2599 30.0 % >>4 Gambit Tiger 2.0 : 2622 31 22 447 53.6 % 2597 40.5 % >>5 Deep Junior 7 : 2616 31 24 447 52.7 % 2597 33.3 % >>6 Junior 7 : 2604 33 24 446 50.7 % 2600 30.9 % >>7 Shredder 6 : 2587 23 32 451 47.7 % 2604 35.5 % >>8 Hiarcs 7.32 : 2581 23 31 446 47.3 % 2599 36.3 % >>9 Nimzo 8 : 2544 26 28 449 41.1 % 2607 34.5 >>%10 Crafty 18.12 : 2530 37 38 228 38.2 % 2614 35.1 >>% >>11 Crafty 18.13 : 2511 39 37 236 36.4 % 2607 33.1 % >>12 Yace 0.99.56 : 2488 68 59 91 34.1 % 2603 28.6 % >>13 Nejmet 3.0 : 2473 96 100 35 32.9 % 2597 37.1 % >> >>I don't think that pairing crafty's against eachother is the best way to find >>the strongest version... well you will probably find the best crafty against >>other crafty's ;) >> >>Regards >>Jonas > >Well trying to find the best crafty is the whole idea. > I know, but you will not find the best Crafty this way, you will only find the version that plays the best against the other Crafty versions and that will not say anything about what Crafty is the strongest. Regards Jonas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.