Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play?

Author: Amir Ban

Date: 04:35:13 01/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 2002 at 06:42:25, Albert Silver wrote:

>On January 28, 2002 at 06:33:26, Amir Ban wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 2002 at 06:12:53, Ed Schröder wrote:
>>
>>>>Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play?
>>>
>>>In the end yes.
>>>
>>>It is my (new) opinion that the nature of chess is just search.
>>>
>>>Elo progress of (professional) chess programs...
>>>
>>>1990 - elo 2000 (average depth 6-8) (TC 40/2h)
>>>1995 - elo 2300 (average depth 8-10)
>>>2000 - elo 2500 (average depth 11-13)
>>>2002 - elo 2600 (average depth 12-14)
>>>
>>
>>This begs the question, because the programs are newer and play positionally
>>different. Will a 1990/1995 program perform 2600+ on today's hardware ?
>>Doubtful.
>>
>>
>>>No way to stop it.
>>>
>>>No suprise Kasparov lost against Deep Blue.
>>
>>It was a surprise because he is clearly better.
>>
>>>
>>>The sad future: it will be in the headlines when a grandmaster occasionally will
>>>win from a computer.
>>>
>>
>>If this will happen due to positionally outplaying will you also consider it sad
>>?
>>
>>Amir
>
>I don't think he meant it would be sad they won, but that this would be
>considered news. In any case, I'm afraid I agree with him on the nature of
>chess. I think that positional play is just extremely deep and refined tactical
>play. Since we approach them differently, we regard them as different, but that
>is still how I regard them. Notice how already some elements of knowledge that
>were necessary in older programs are removed as the search makes up for it.
>Naturally this isn't the whole trend, but it does say something.
>

I think GM's will still be beating Genius 2 and Fritz 3 in 2010.

In computer chess the line dividing positional play and tactics is very sharp
and is the difference between what is known through search or through
evaluation. This sharp line raises a sharp question as to how to make progress ?
My own opinion is that evaluation is the most promising option.

Amir




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.