Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:59:30 01/28/02

Go up one level in this thread

On January 28, 2002 at 09:02:50, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On January 28, 2002 at 06:12:53, Ed Schröder wrote:
>
>>>Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play?
>>
>>In the end yes.
>>
>>It is my (new) opinion that the nature of chess is just search.
>
>the opposite is already clearly proven in tournament play Ed.
>
>Note that newer versions from most programs search less deeply
>than older versions. This is also clear evidence.

I am going to believe that new version search less deeply than older versions
only if I see that they need more time to see tactics.

Uri

• Re: Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play? Vincent Diepeveen 09:42:08 01/28/02
  • Re: Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play? Robert Hyatt 10:54:01 01/28/02
    • Re: Will TACTIC's eventually REFUTE! Positional play? Robin Smith 17:15:52 01/29/02
    • Re: Well said Mr. Hyatt! (NT) Otello Gnaramori 02:33:46 01/29/02
  • another example of positional solving Vincent Diepeveen 09:45:52 01/28/02
    • Re: another example of positional solving Miguel A. Ballicora 11:42:21 01/28/02

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.