Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: New G4's; ddr L3 cache significant or not?

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 16:36:16 01/28/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 28, 2002 at 14:08:49, Will Singleton wrote:

>On January 28, 2002 at 11:50:13, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 2002 at 11:44:00, Will Singleton wrote:
>>
>>>The new Mac G4's came out today, 933mhz and 1ghz versions.  Question: this 2mb
>>>of ddr L3 cache seems new.  Is that something that would significantly affect
>>>integer performance?
>>
>>the slow speed of the processors, 933Mhz is the bottleneck here.
>>
>>Also it is unknown what the penalty is for a branch misprediction. on
>>paper they can do like the P4 (which runs 2.2Ghz by the way) 4 instructions
>>a clock, but if branchmisprediction penalty is according to that, then
>>there is no fun here.
>>
>>After this the L1 cache is real important. A bad L1 cache can do more harm
>>to a processor than L2 cache obviously can. L2 cache is for example
>>for crafty not relevant whether it's 1 MB or 2 MB (Xeon processors)
>>
>>After L2 cache there comes the L3 cache.
>>
>>So the importance of L3 cache is there of course, otherwise it would
>>not exist i guess. But a bigger L3 cache will not be like 20% faster or so
>>for a chessprogram. I doubt 1% even.
>>
>
>Apparently this is a new processor with SOI, the 7455.  But they say the design
>tops out at max 1ghz, so really there's not much good here.  Wait for the G5's,
>I guess.

the g5 goes to 2Ghz?

by then i'll buy a 10Ghz P9 if you don't mind :)

>For those who want to look at all the specs:
>
>http://e-www.motorola.com/webapp/sps/site/prod_summary.jsp?code=MPC7455&node
>Id=03M943030450467M98653
>
>Will



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.