Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik Vs. Which Software questions......

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 05:27:46 01/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 2002 at 07:44:37, Otello Gnaramori wrote:

>On January 29, 2002 at 06:54:07, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On January 29, 2002 at 04:45:07, Otello Gnaramori wrote:
>>
>>>If the match between Fritz and Kramnik will be held in October, I'm wondering on
>>>which program will be against Mr. Kramnik.
>>>The first chosen was Deep Fritz for its multiprocessor capabilities (can run on
>>>8 cpu's powered machine) , but meanwhile Fritz7 was out with a brand new
>>>powerful engine, though I'm not sure about its multiprocessor features of the
>>>latest... anybody knows ?
>>>
>>>w.b.r.
>>>Otello
>>
>>The first choice was not the commercial Deep Fritz and I think that you are
>>wrong to assume that chessbase is going to use something that is commercial.
>>
>
>1) Which was the first choice ?

The first choice was secret Deep Fritz that was based on Fritz7 engine.

>2) Why do not use something commercial since it can be advantaging from the
>incomes point of view...
>
>
>>I guess that multiprocessor capability is not important for 90% of the users so
>>chessbase has no reason to invest on commercial version of Fritz7 with more than
>>one processor.
>>
>
>So probably they will go for Deep Fritz if a multiprocessor machine will be
>used.
>
>>
>>I also remember that people complained about Deep Fritz and claimed that for
>>some reason it is only slightly faster with 2 processors when Junior and
>>Shredder earns more speed from 2 processors so I believe that chessbase were
>>right when they did not release a multi processor version of Fritz(If they can
>>do it only 20 or 30% faster with 2 processors then there are not going to be
>>many people who are really interested in buying a multi-processor version of
>>Fritz).
>>
>>Uri
>
>But don't you think that Fritz7 is reasonably better than Deep Fritz engine, so
>what is the rational to use an inferior engine though if it's multiprocessor
>capable ?

I agree that Fritz7 is better but the point is that I do not think that they
cannot use parallel Fritz7.

The fact that they do not sell parallel Deep Fritz based on Fritz7 engine does
not mean that they do not have a parallel version of Fritz7.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.