Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: KAISSA for PC, I'm the proud owner

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 21:09:27 01/29/02

Go up one level in this thread


On January 29, 2002 at 14:19:26, Uri Blass wrote:

>On January 29, 2002 at 14:08:45, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On January 28, 2002 at 16:57:35, Joshua Lee wrote:
>>
>>>>>Congrats on taking the initiative.
>>>>>
>>>>>Can we assume that this is a DOS program and that it is related somehow to the
>>>>>Russian mainframe chess program of the old days?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Even less than you can assume Crafty is related to Cray Blitz.  :)
>>>
>>>This is basically the version that was rewritten into "Turbo-C" and from the
>>>documentation has refinements from the version that played in the 2nd Computer
>>>Olympiad in London 1990. It is about as close as we can get to the actual
>>>mainframe version from the 70's. So like Crafty is related to Cray Blitz , so is
>>>this PC version of Kaissa. I would like to mention something fairly obvious but
>>>yet interesting that is where Kaissa in 1972 played Komsomolskia Pravda Readers
>>>it took 90 minutes in one instance to search 1,500,000  this PC version on a
>>>1Ghz it searched 2,673,745 in 56 seconds. Huge increase from 200-300 Positions
>>>per second i'd say. The readers played Spassky in 1971 in two games and drew one
>>>and lost the other. Spassky at that time was 2690 which would put the readers
>>>average at 2490. Kaissa managed the same result against the readers losing one
>>>game and drawing the other which would put it's average at 2290.
>>
>>The problem is that the way they searched in 1974 has _nothing_ to do with the
>>way they searched in 1990.  Ditto for Blitz in 1977 WCCC, vs Cray Blitz in
>>the 1983 WCCC event.  There is simply nothing comparable between those two
>>programs, even though I wrote _both_.  Faster hardware completely changed the
>>way the search was used...  And it changed what could be evaluated as well...
>
>You tried to write a strong program when you wrote Cray blitz.
>I believe that they did not try to write a strong program after 1974 so you
>cannot know that they searched in a different way.
>
>Uri


However I _do_ know that Kaissa 1974 was a strong program for that time
period.  And there were a few "brute force" programs running at the time
and they all got smashed due to 3-4 ply searches max...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.