Author: Roy Eassa
Date: 15:37:16 01/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2002 at 11:58:49, Andrew Smith wrote: >This is an interesting position. In particular, the fourth move in the winning >line. Qg7 Kh2 f8Q Qb6+ Kh6 *Bc6*. Other moves are possibly winning but 4. Bc6 >looks to be the best by far. I let gambit tiger analyse this over night, and it >couldn't come up with 4. Bc6. What do other programs think here on fast >hardware? Can they find Bc6 in the initial position? > >[D]5Q2/5P1b/8/7K/8/1q4k1/1p4B1/8 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 7 (AMD 1.2): 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Kxh7 b1Q+ 5.Kh8 Qb8 6.Qfg8 Qxg8+ 7.Kxg8 +- (1.60) Depth: 7/23 00:00:00 232kN 1.Qg7+! +- (1.88) Depth: 8/23 00:00:00 308kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kg4 Bf5+ 4.Qxf5 Qxf5+ 5.Kxf5 b1Q+ 6.Be4 Qf1+ 7.Ke6 Qh3+ 8.Kd5 +- (1.94) Depth: 8/23 00:00:00 426kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kg4 Bf5+ 4.Qxf5 Qxf5+ 5.Kxf5 b1Q+ 6.Be4 Qf1+ 7.Ke6 Qe2 8.Qe5+ +- (1.75) Depth: 9/25 00:00:01 1042kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Kxh7 b1Q+ 5.Kh8 Qb8 6.Bd5 Qxf8+ 7.Qxf8 Qg6 +- (1.50) Depth: 10/30 00:00:04 3064kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Kxh7 b1Q+ 5.Kh8 Qb8 6.Bd5 Qxf8+ 7.Qxf8 Qa1+ 8.Kg8 +- (1.47) Depth: 11/30 00:00:13 9070kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Kxh7 b1Q+ 5.Kh8 Qb8 6.Bd5 Qxf8+ 7.Qxf8 Qa1+ 8.Kg8 ± (1.35) Depth: 12/33 00:00:35 24340kN 1.Qg7+! +- (1.63) Depth: 13/33 00:01:03 43219kN 1.Qg7+! +- (1.91) Depth: 13/33 00:01:06 45224kN 1.Qg7+! +- (2.47) Depth: 13/33 00:01:09 47283kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Bc6 Qxc6+ 5.Kxh7 b1Q+ 6.Kh8 Qg2 7.Qh6+ Kg1 8.Qc5+ +- (9.44) Depth: 13/37 00:01:43 70103kN 1.Qg7+ Kh2 2.f8Q Qb5+ 3.Kh6 Qb6+ 4.Bc6 Qxc6+ 5.Kxh7 b1Q+ 6.Kh8 Qbg6 7.Qe5+ Kg2 8.Qe2+ +- (9.50) Depth: 14/39 00:03:24 139929kN
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.