Author: Tina Long
Date: 21:32:16 01/30/02
Go up one level in this thread
On January 30, 2002 at 23:37:10, walter irvin wrote: >On January 30, 2002 at 20:10:57, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On January 30, 2002 at 20:01:04, walter irvin wrote: >> >>>it seems to me that deep blue was a great chess machine ,but i believe with deep >>>fritz and the right hardware a stronger machine could be had .i think it was >>>fritz 3 that proved that a pc could compete with the big boys . >> >>Now that Deep Blue is retired, all the PC's can thump their chest and call out: >>"I'm king of the jungle!" >> >>Who's to argue whether or not the current PC programs could compete effectively >>against Deep Blue? We really don't know since we don't have a Deep Blue to play >>against. >> >>Really, I could claim that Deep Blue would never lose again. Or I could claim >>that now it would lose 100% of its games against Diep. But without anything to >>test again we are back to angels dancing on the head of a pin. > >maybe there is no way to tell for sure , or is there?? true deep blue is gone >for good , but kasparov is still more or less kasparov i mean he is still atop >the rating list .if he were to play a top rated program in a serious match like >he did vs deep blue then we would have a measuring stick of sorts Only if Kasparov plays as abysmally as he did in some games against Deep Blue. He will never play so badly as to repeat the type of Opening error he made in the last game against Deep Blue. And statistically one 6-8 game match compared to another 6-8 game match tell us nothing. Deep Blue is gone. Long live the King. Tina Long .as far as >that goes kramnik was going to play a top rated program i heard . if so that >might give some indication as to how close to deep blue todays pc's are .
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.