Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 23:55:39 01/31/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 01:47:43, Uri Blass wrote: >On January 31, 2002 at 19:54:33, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: > >>>you may get the GM title in >>>correspondence games. >> >> >>You, or your computer? >> >>J. > >Your computers >I did not say that one computer is enough. > >I believe that buying many fast computers (one for every opponent) and let them >work 100% of the time in playing the opponent moves is enough to get the GM >title in postal chess. > >If you use only one computer you have less time per move so your computer may >get only the IM title. Let's not forget the programs! They should get some title too. But I guess we can also give some credit to the operators. If you look at some analysis of postal games, you will see where the computer operators will blindly make a move that even a 1500 player would never make (e.g. caging his own piece for no reasons). So, I think that to succeed you *must* have some chess insight.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.