Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:03:52 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 02:55:39, Dann Corbit wrote: >On February 01, 2002 at 01:47:43, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On January 31, 2002 at 19:54:33, Jeroen van Dorp wrote: >> >>>>you may get the GM title in >>>>correspondence games. >>> >>> >>>You, or your computer? >>> >>>J. >> >>Your computers >>I did not say that one computer is enough. >> >>I believe that buying many fast computers (one for every opponent) and let them >>work 100% of the time in playing the opponent moves is enough to get the GM >>title in postal chess. >> >>If you use only one computer you have less time per move so your computer may >>get only the IM title. > >Let's not forget the programs! They should get some title too. But I guess we >can also give some credit to the operators. If you look at some analysis of >postal games, you will see where the computer operators will blindly make a move >that even a 1500 player would never make (e.g. caging his own piece for no >reasons). So, I think that to succeed you *must* have some chess insight. These cases after long analysis are rare. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.