Author: ALI MIRAFZALI
Date: 08:40:02 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 11:27:30, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 01, 2002 at 10:59:15, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: > >>On February 01, 2002 at 07:45:41, Graham Laight wrote: >> >>>A single processor machine simply hasn't got the power to overcome this >>>opponent. >>> >>>However, I think he'll slip up a couple of times - hence the draws. >>> >>>-g >>You underestimate Computers very much.The great majority of GM games >>are won and lost through elementary tactical errors.Rebel will crush >>wanWely. > > >No > >The great majority of GM games at tournament time control are not won or lost >for elementary tactical reasons. > >There are games when GM's do elementary tactical errors but they are not >majority of the GM-GM games. > >It is not clear who is going to win in the match but even I have some games that >I drew with no tactical errors based on computer analysis and I am not close to >be a GM. > >Van wely is supposed to be also better than the average GM. > >Uri By Elementary I meant Elementary from a Computer Stand point.The Tactics can be very Deep Of course.It is Statistics that GM games are won and lost through Tactics Mostly.There are many examples but I recommend going over Anand's three loses at Dortmund to Moro, Kramnik,and Topolov .On the other taking advantage of a Computers Positional errors is difficult.Kasparov could not do it in 1997.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.