Author: Miguel A. Ballicora
Date: 09:23:30 02/01/02
Go up one level in this thread
On February 01, 2002 at 12:16:40, Uri Blass wrote: >On February 01, 2002 at 12:14:28, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 01, 2002 at 11:40:02, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >> >>>On February 01, 2002 at 11:27:30, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On February 01, 2002 at 10:59:15, ALI MIRAFZALI wrote: >>>> >>>>>On February 01, 2002 at 07:45:41, Graham Laight wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>A single processor machine simply hasn't got the power to overcome this >>>>>>opponent. >>>>>> >>>>>>However, I think he'll slip up a couple of times - hence the draws. >>>>>> >>>>>>-g >>>>>You underestimate Computers very much.The great majority of GM games >>>>>are won and lost through elementary tactical errors.Rebel will crush >>>>>wanWely. >>>> >>>> >>>>No >>>> >>>>The great majority of GM games at tournament time control are not won or lost >>>>for elementary tactical reasons. >>>> >>>>There are games when GM's do elementary tactical errors but they are not >>>>majority of the GM-GM games. >>>> >>>>It is not clear who is going to win in the match but even I have some games that >>>>I drew with no tactical errors based on computer analysis and I am not close to >>>>be a GM. >>>> >>>>Van wely is supposed to be also better than the average GM. >>>> >>>>Uri >>>By Elementary I meant Elementary from a Computer Stand point.The Tactics can >>>be very Deep Of course.It is Statistics that GM games are won and lost through >>>Tactics Mostly.There are many examples but I recommend going over Anand's three >>>loses at Dortmund to Moro, Kramnik,and Topolov . >> >>Most of the GM games are drawn and there are many draws with no tactical >>mistakes. >> >>You may be right that most of the games when GM lose are because of tactical >>mistakes but in order to be fair you need to take all the game when most of them >>are drawn. >> >>Uri > >I can add that GM Robert heubner drew 6 games against Fritz some monthes ago and >in most of the games there were no tactical mistakes. IIRC, Huebner missed a win because of a silly mistake. Otherwise, he would have won the match comfortably. Regards, Miguel > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.